different-sites-require-different-stormwater-solutions

Different Sites Require Different Stormwater Solutions

By Kelly McKendry, Director – Water & Environment, PEAKURBAN

It is par for the course that when preparing a Development Application in Queensland a Stormwater Management Plan (SMP or SWMP) is generally required. However, a SWMP shouldn’t give you the same solution for every site. For instance, stormwater detention may not be required for all projects, or what’s considered ‘adverse impact’ or ‘actionable nuisance’ might be different for different sites.

Approaching the preparation of an SWMP from not just a technical perspective but also a commercial one, can deliver valuable outcomes for all stakeholders. For example, developers can achieve more developable land and Council end up with less basins to maintain, reducing ongoing maintenance costs.

The four main aspects that should be addressed in a SWMP are:

1. Flooding: from a regional system or local overland flow.

2. Quantity: addressing increases in flow due to the development and potential mitigation measures such as detention requirements.

3. Quality: meeting the State Planning Policy SPP (in Queensland) and the local authority’s requirements for improving the quality of runoff from our catchment.

4. Lawful Point of Discharge (in Queensland): the location and conditions under which stormwater can flow from a property.

Flooding and Overland Flow

Having a site with flood hazard or overland flow planning overlays does not necessarily mean that part of your site is excluded from development. Depending on the LGA and it’s planning scheme you may be able to put stormwater basins and bioretention within the flood extent and/ or it may be possible to do earthworks within the flood extent if there are no, or acceptable, impacts. Filling within floodplains may also be possible, however there is likely to be some specific rules around what you need to do in terms of compensatory cut and fill to achieve a no nett loss of floodplain storage.

Quantity (Detention)
Urban development and increases in the impervious nature of a site will have the effect of increasing the rate and volume of stormwater running off a site. However, a detention basin is not always the answer.

A ‘site based’ SWMP should not be limited to consideration of what is happening on the site only. This is a mistake made on many developments and by many engineers. The potential changes in stormwater runoff from the site need to be considered in the context of:

  • the existing land use of the site;
  • the location of the site within the catchment;
  • the downstream drainage infrastructure and its capacity; and
  • the drainage system into which the site is discharging.

If, for example, discharge from the site can be conveyed to a creek or river system without causing nuisance or damage then detention may not be required. Similarly, if the site is located in a catchment were the increased rate of discharge or timing of the discharge from the site does not alter or worsen the peak of flood flows within the waterway then again detention may not be required (despite the Council planning scheme indicating it is).  A focus on local flow management, velocity control and scour may be more appropriate.

Stormwater Quality
In Queensland the State Planning Policy (SPP) must be considered for those triggered by the type of development (reconfiguring a lot, material change of use and operational works) and area of land to be developed (generally greater than 2500m2). Most local Planning schemes have now been amended to mirror the requirements of the SPP but may also contain additional requirements for the treatment of stormwater from new development.

The SPP standard for stormwater treatment is to meet a load based reduction target for the common pollutants (known as the 80/60/45/90 WQOs in SEQld). Again these targets may differ in different geographical locations and as a result of the local Planning Scheme.

Most engineers have forgotten that there are more Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) options than just bioretention basins to treat stormwater.

Some of the WSUD elements available for use in a treatment train include:

  • Swales and buffers
  • Bioretention swales
  • Sediment basins
  • Bioretention basins
  • Streetscape bioretention and tree pits
  • Constructed Wetlands
  • Infiltration measures
  • Stormwater harvesting
  • Passive irrigation
  • Rainwater tanks and re-use

Choosing the correct and most appropriate elements can reduce capital cost, maximise developable land, benefit the environment and improve life cycle costs.

Lawful point of discharge (LPOD)
If uninformed, or worse misinformed, lawful point of discharge can become the Achilles heel of a development project resulting in stalled projects, held up due to ‘discharge approval’ not being obtained

The Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (QUDM) has long been held as the reference for Lawful Point of Discharge (LPOD) in Queensland. However, it is cautioned that each Local Authority may (and do), apply a definition of and demonstration of meeting LPOD differently.

There are now two versions of QUDM that are currently adopted and referenced in local planning schemes and associated codes and policies. The versions have slightly different wording around determining if a lawful point of discharge is achieved.

The older version applies a ‘two point test’; with confusion over the definition or demonstration of meeting LPOD, referencing a “no worsening” criteria by definition and elsewhere speaks of “no actionable nuisance”. Often more influential was the second part of the test which required lawful control over the land onto which discharge was proposed. Often downstream landholder discharge agreements or easements and drainage reserves were required for approval.

The current version of QUDM inserts what has been coined a ‘do you need it’ test. The premise now is that if discharge from a site can be demonstrated to be released in a manner that will not substantially damage third party property then no further steps are required to meet a LPOD. This opens the way to allow development applications to demonstrate stormwater is to be managed in such a way that there will be no substantial damage to downstream property and thus development can theoretically proceed without the authority having lawful control over a discharge location (or permission to discharge).

However, QUDM itself is not a legal document in its own right but a mere guideline for best practice. A local authority may choose to reference one or the other version of QUDM or include specific requirements on meeting LPOD within their local planning scheme and instruments. This is certainly the current case in Queensland.  Whilst, LPOD is still a critical issue to be addressed in a SWMP, how the stormwater solution is framed and designed will influence if you need LPOD at all.

In summary

  • don’t expect that a SWMP will always recommend the same infrastructure requirements or solution for different sites;
  • Flood and overland flow overlays may not be a show stopper.  Make sure  you get the right advice;
  • The right advice could save you building a detention basin and can assist in maximising developable land;
  • Be open to alternative, and clever, use of WSUD to treat stormwater;
  • LPOD is still an issue and you should be advised of the specific requirements based on the site location.

When a project kicks off, getting expert advice early will optimise the development potential of a site. You almost always need a SWMP but not all SWMPs answers should be the same.

Different Sites Require Different Stormwater Solutions

By Kelly McKendry, Director – Water & Environment, PEAKURBAN It is par for the course that when preparing a Development Application in Queensland a Stormwater Management Plan (SMP or SWMP) is generally required. However, a SWMP shouldn’t give you the same solution for every site. For instance, stormwater detention may not be required for all … Continue reading Different Sites Require Different Stormwater Solutions

Where are the next Masterplanned Community projects going to be?

By Troy Schultz, Principal Engineer, PEAKURBAN In recent years I’ve noticed an increasing trend of developer’s seeking acquisition sites with minimal planning risk (inside urban footprint, appropriately zoned and preferably with an approval in place). Who could blame them given the political and regulatory minefield they are facing these days. More and more clients tell … Continue reading Where are the next Masterplanned Community projects going to be?

Managing Costs and Value in the “New World”

By Andrew Ngo, Principal Engineer, PEAKURBAN There is little doubt that cost control is a hot topic now. While it has always been important to manage costs regardless of the market cycle, the question though is whether the necessary spending was more than it should have been in the first place. We previously wrote an … Continue reading Managing Costs and Value in the “New World”

Key Points when Negotiating Infrastructure Agreements

By Brent Thomas A well-constructed Infrastructure Agreement (IA) provides certainty for the developer and Authority regarding the delivery of various trunk infrastructure items. A good IA will clearly set out the obligations of each party, the funding and extent of infrastructure to be provided, identify any offsets and mechanisms for refunds, specify trigger points and … Continue reading Key Points when Negotiating Infrastructure Agreements

PEAKURBAN welcomes Brendon Bolt to the Water & Environment Team.

Brendon has over 18 years’ experience practicing in the field of environment and water resources. His vast experience in local and regional scale projects includes water balance modelling, hydrologic modelling, 1D/2D hydraulic modelling, flood mapping in GIS, conceptual / detailed design, environmental management and permitting, erosion and sediment control, water quality modelling, drainage assessment and … Continue reading PEAKURBAN welcomes Brendon Bolt to the Water & Environment Team.

PEAKURBAN expands into Water and Environment!

We are delighted to announce that Kelly McKendry has joined PEAKURBAN as Director of our newly created Water and Environment Team! Kelly has over 18 years’ experience in stormwater quality and quantity management as well as flood modelling. Notably, Kelly recently managed her own consultancy and is highly regarded in the industry having completed many … Continue reading PEAKURBAN expands into Water and Environment!

Getting Those Credits You’re Entitled to: Converting Non-Trunk Infrastructure to Trunk Infrastructure

By Andrew Ngo We previously wrote about the conversion application process and how to obtain the infrastructure credits that you are entitled to on your projects. Our previous article can be found in the link below. https://www.peakurban.com.au/conversion-applications-get-the-credits-you-are-entitled-to/ To recap, a conversion application is an application that developers can make under the Planning Act 2016 (Section … Continue reading Getting Those Credits You’re Entitled to: Converting Non-Trunk Infrastructure to Trunk Infrastructure

Unlocking Land and Delivering Affordability

By Brent Thomas (Published in UDIA Qld Establish Magazine #112 – Spring 2019) In all growth corridors across South East Queensland (SEQ), it is widely known that there are major land holdings in the urban footprint (UF) that have been identified as suitable for urban development, but have been locked up due to any range … Continue reading Unlocking Land and Delivering Affordability

What’s the cost per lot across SEQ Growth Corridors

By Troy Schultz We know that developers need to act quickly to secure development sites. Quite often a quick, informed assessment of a site using typical revenue and cost data is sufficient to enable a site value to be ascertained and a high level offer put in front of the vendor. To assist our clients, … Continue reading What’s the cost per lot across SEQ Growth Corridors

Updated EDQ Road Standards – What’s the impact on your project?

EDQ have released a new version of their ‘Street and Movement Network’ guideline. The new guideline can be accessed here. There are some significant changes included in the latest revision which may adversely affect development yield and cost. Some more notable changes include: Road reserve widths and pavement widths have changed for all road types, … Continue reading Updated EDQ Road Standards – What’s the impact on your project?

Launching PEAK Ai – Improving Project Design, Planning and Execution

The engineering and construction industry is at the cusp of a new era, with new applications and tools that change how companies design, plan and execute projects. At PEAKURBAN we are always trying to maximise the value and improve the level of service we offer to our clients. Quite often this involves developing smarter infrastructure … Continue reading Launching PEAK Ai – Improving Project Design, Planning and Execution

Changes to the Security of Payment Act

By Troy Schultz, Principal Engineer, PEAKURBAN At PEAKURAN, we aim to stay on top of key changes so that we are equipped to continue protecting our client’s interests. You may be aware that the Building Industry Fairness Act 2017 (Qld) (BIFA) commenced on 17 December 2018. This replaces the Building and Construction Industry Payment Act … Continue reading Changes to the Security of Payment Act

Managing Costs and Value in a Slower Market

By Andrew Ngo, Principal Engineer, PEAKURBAN There’s a lot of media articles about slower sales and a tighter credit market across the country, especially in Sydney and Melbourne. Having been through a couple of ‘challenging’ times previously, this inevitably affects market confidence with developers attentions more sharply focused on finding cost reductions and optimising value … Continue reading Managing Costs and Value in a Slower Market

PEAKURBAN Turns 2

It’s hard to believe that it’s been 2 years since we opened the doors at PEAKURBAN. You never really know how things will turn out but the journey thus far has been both exciting and fulfilling. We started PEAKURBAN believing that the old way of doing business (at least in engineering circles) was fast disappearing … Continue reading PEAKURBAN Turns 2

PEAKURBAN Planning and Survey

We are delighted to welcome Tim Connolly (Director – Planning) and Nathan Wilson (Principal Planner) to the PEAKURBAN Planning and Survey team. Tim has over 30 years’ experience in statutory and strategic planning and has worked on many large and complex projects including Warner Lakes, Riverbank, Riverparks, Park Vista, Capestone, Brentwood, The Meadows and Ridgeview. … Continue reading PEAKURBAN Planning and Survey

How to Get Your Survey Plans Sealed Earlier

A key milestone for any urban development project is plan sealing, that critical event that facilitates registration of titles and settlements, and the trigger for project revenue to be realised. In talking with several developers, they describe an increasingly arduous and frustrating process of back and forward, multiple inspections, delays and inefficiencies. Whilst there’s always … Continue reading How to Get Your Survey Plans Sealed Earlier

Can’t get stormwater discharge consent? You may not need it.

Whether or not a Legal Point of Discharge (LPOD) exists has been for a long time, a very grey and murky area. The consequences of this ambiguity have meant stalled projects, refusal of development applications, cost over-runs and quarantined development sites. We have heard of some developers even needing to store or pump out stormwater! … Continue reading Can’t get stormwater discharge consent? You may not need it.

Conversion Applications – Get the credits you are entitled to.

In talking with several developers recently, it seems that the issues around trunk and non-trunk infrastructure and what’s creditable v. non creditable is alive and well. A few developers that we’ve spoken with are quite frustrated in having received development approvals imposing conditions that require them to deliver (without credits) what they believe to be … Continue reading Conversion Applications – Get the credits you are entitled to.

Infrastructure Agreements: Negotiating the Right Deal.

Negotiating the right deal in an Infrastructure Agreement (IA) is critical in ensuring the commercial viability of a project. On too many occasions we have seen IA’s that are one sided, impose excessive infrastructure standards and as a consequence result in works or financial contributions that stall projects for long periods of time. The last … Continue reading Infrastructure Agreements: Negotiating the Right Deal.

Is Poor Contract Administration Costing You Money?

By Ryan Ashworth, Civil Engineer at PEAKURBAN Poor contract administration can lead to lower development profits, protracted disputes, missed settlements and sub-standard infrastructure. Whether it’s a lack of site experience, a poorly constructed contract or just a lack of understanding of what’s required, it seems to be a common problem we hear throughout the development … Continue reading Is Poor Contract Administration Costing You Money?

Engineering value in a tough market – the site acquisition challenge

By Andrew Ngo, Principal Engineer at PEAKURBAN 2017 so far has been an intensely competitive year when it comes to buying development sites. Despite this, over the last couple of months we’ve helped four clients successfully acquire new projects – three residential development sites (1,830 lots) and one retirement project (145 sites). So, what have … Continue reading Engineering value in a tough market – the site acquisition challenge

Giving up too much land?

A number of clients have come to us recently raising concerns about losing too much developable land, due to easements and wider infrastructure corridors being imposed by Authorities.  The reason, they advise, is for future maintenance requirements.  What many clients may not be aware of is the maintenance method of “pipe bursting” which in many cases, means the … Continue reading Giving up too much land?